🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that smartphones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to approve a law lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a similar action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," said a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, support built behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to design products and services that are secure and fit for children," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the regional level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various politicians to copy this path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional states are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

As this international discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are no longer prepared to wait for platforms to self-regulate.